All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the defendant A shall be sentenced to imprisonment of one year and two months, two months, two or three years, and one year and two months, in case of the defendant B) of the court below's sentence (the defendant A shall be sentenced to imprisonment of one year and two months) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the victims of larceny do not want to be punished by the Defendants is that the crime Nos. 2 and 3 of the judgment of the court below should be considered at the same time as the case of the first head of the judgment of the court below, which is in the relation of concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act, is favorable to the Defendants.

On the other hand, Defendant A had been punished twice for the larceny-related crime, and even if he had been punished for a repeated crime due to fraud, etc., Defendant B had been punished three times for the larceny-related crime, and Defendant B had the record of being punished three times for the larceny-related crime, even though he had been in the period of suspension of execution due to special larceny, he was going to the crime of Article 1 of the judgment of the court below, and the Defendants’ violation of the number of crimes of Article 1 of the judgment of the court below is

In addition, considering the various circumstances shown in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendants’ age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment against the Defendants is too unreasonable, and thus, it is not acceptable to accept the Defendants’ assertion.

3. The Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.