logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.11.02 2018고정1432
사기등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant’s fraud is a person who received each loan through C, a lending company, on October 6, 2014, and D Bank on December 18, 2015, and E, on February 17, 2016, and failed to repay the loan (tentatively named) and was prevented from returning the loan.

The Defendant stated in the indictment of the Victim F Bank Co., Ltd., Ltd., a lending company via the Internet at a place where the location is unknown on April 26, 2016. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the Defendant is “F Bank Co., Ltd.,” and the other party who entered into a workplace credit loan agreement on April 26, 2016 is merely a “F Bank Co., Ltd.,” and G Co., Ltd. is merely a transferee of the Defendant’s claim against the Defendant F Bank Co., Ltd. to the extent that it does not interfere with the Defendant’s right to defense. Therefore, the facts charged

In addition, in a place where the location cannot be known on July 15, 2016, by applying for loans of KRW 15,000 and KRW 428,851 for loans of KRW 15,000 between 72-months, and by applying for loans of KRW 111,530 for loans of KRW 2,70,000 via the Internet, and to repay KRW 111,530 from the first day of each month to the victim G Co., Ltd. by applying for loans of KRW 2,700,000 for loans of KRW 36 months, but there was no intention or ability to repay from the beginning.

The Defendant, as if he were to repay the loan, was given a total of KRW 17,700,00 from the victimized Company to the HI bank account in the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the damaged company, acquired the property by deceiving the damaged company.

2. The defendants Gap's evasion of the compulsory execution by the defendants is the defendant Eul's Chok, and the defendant Eul is the outside third party of the defendant Eul.

Defendant

A is likely to be subject to compulsory execution in the event of a loan from a victim G Co., Ltd., as described in the above paragraph 1, and the loan is not repaid.

arrow