Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. The occupation of a private document comparison;

A. The Defendant attempted to apply for a visa to obtain a visa to be married with Vietnam Women B and to enter the Republic of Korea, but did not have any financial capacity to prove, and thus, failed to apply for a visa by forging a real estate lease agreement.

On May 2010, the Defendant forged one copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of E and licensed real estate agent H, a private document on the rights and obligations, by signing in the column for indication of real estate in the real estate lease form in the real estate transaction form of the real estate lease agreement in the Seocho-do House A-301, with a verification color pen, the Defendant stated in the column for deposit money, the lessor’s column, the lessor’s column, “D, E, and the Licensed Real Estate Agent H in the Gyeonggi-do CityF,” respectively, and affixing in advance the seal of E and H, a private document on the rights and obligations by affixing the seal of E and the Licensed Real Estate Agent H.

B. At around 14:00 on April 29, 2010, the Defendant entered the marriage report form in the civil petition service form in the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office and entered the details of the marriage in advance and entered the name in the name column of the witness, and entered the name “E”, “I” and “J at the address of the office of the office of the office of the public official

2. The holding of the relevant investigation document;

A. On June 9, 2010, the Defendant filed an application for a visa of Vietnam with a consular official of the Republic of Korea in Vietnam, Vietnam, and subsequently filed it with the competent official, as if it were a document duly formed, as set forth in paragraph 1(a) of the above provision.

B. At around 14:00 on April 29, 2010, the Defendant submitted a forged marriage report to the competent employee as if it were a document duly prepared at the office and civil petition service of the Nowon-gu Office in Bupyeong-gu Office and the office of Seocheon-gu Office as referred to in paragraph 1(b) of the above provision.

3. The point of violation of administrative justice.