1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2.The phrase "the calculation table of the amount of damages" and the phrase "the calculation table of the expenses for future treatment" in Part VI of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be replaced by the following table:

From 4th to 13th of the decision of the court of first instance, the following shall apply:

【1) Antiscopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics: 2,824,00 on October 26, 2016

2) Metal removal method: The expenditure of KRW 3,00,000 on October 26, 2016, which is the day following the date of the closing of argument in the court of first instance for the convenience of calculation, shall be deemed to have been made on October 26, 2016, inasmuch as there is no evidence that the Plaintiff has paid the expenses after undergoing the said surgery. 3) Rehabilitation treatment, etc.: 240,000 won per month (=one time 20,000 x three times x four weeks) shall be deemed to have been made from October 26, 2016 to October 4, 2017 (see attached Table of Calculation of Medical Expenses). The last day of the fourth sentence of the first instance judgment of the court of first instance "this court's entrustment of physical examinations to the heads of the annexed hospitals of the colleges of the Korean National University of the first instance and the heads of affiliated hospitals of the affiliated universities," and the second through the second sentence to May 2, 2015.

Therefore, the Defendant’s damages amounting to KRW 26,946,201 (i.e., KRW 22,946,201; KRW 4,000; KRW 4,000; KRW 22,946,201; and (ii) property damages amounting to KRW 22,946,201, which is the date the instant accident occurred. From October 5, 2014, which is the date the Defendant was sentenced to the judgment of the court of first instance, that disputes over the existence or scope of the Defendant’s obligation to perform. 5% per annum, KRW 4,00,00 as stipulated under the Civil Act, until December 16, 2016.