1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used by the court as set forth in the following 2. Thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part used in the first instance court is as follows: “The results of physical examination commissioned by the court of first instance to the head of a university affiliated with a university affiliated with a university and college and the results of fact inquiry (the results of physical examination commissioned by the court of first instance to the head of a university affiliated with a university and college and the results of fact inquiry (the results of fact inquiry)”; “The results of physical examination commissioned by the head of an affiliated university of this court to the head of a university affiliated with a university and college affiliated with a university and college of the first instance (the results of physical examination commissioned by the court of first instance)”; “The results of physical examination commissioned by the court of first instance to the head of an affiliated university of a university affiliated with a university and college of the first instance (the results of physical examination commissioned by the court of first instance)”; and “part of the physical examination expenses entrusted by the court of first instance to the head of the affiliated university and college.”

Of the judgments of the first instance court, "Article 3-3 (c)(6)(3)(2)(2)(3)(2)(2)(3)(7)(2)(2)(7)(2)(10

[C. 1] According to the results of physical examination of the head of a university affiliated with a college of the first instance court and the sex surgery of the first instance court, it is recognized that the plaintiff's right-hand left-hand left-off of 15 cc and 12 cc x 5 cm each exists on the right-hand left-off, and that the first operation cost of 6,618,000 won and the second operation cost of 9,460,700 won are required to remove the reflect.

Since there is no evidence to support that the Plaintiff spent the above surgery expenses by the date of the closing of argument in the trial, the first operation expenses for the convenience of calculation shall be deemed to have been spent on the day following the date of the closing of argument in the trial, and the second operation expenses after one year from the date of the closing of argument in the trial at the time of the

Sexual surgery costs (amount required) m (amount of expenditure) (The first sex surgery cost) 6,618,000 won.