Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant assaulted the victim B (28 years of age) more than twice, and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning civil petition guidance and office building security service of the police assigned for special guard.

1. On November 25, 2013, at around 14:38, 2013, the Defendant snowed a breath while under the influence of alcohol at a viewing public service center of the same year, which is located in the Yacheon-dong, Gangwon-do, the Defendant: (a) breathing the breath in the state of drinking; (b) breathing the disturbance to the victim B, who is the police assigned for viewing in the same year; and (c) breathing his chest on several occasions; and (d) breathing his bluth with a blu

2. On November 25, 2013, at around 16:00 on November 25, 2013, the Defendant re-exploited at the place under the preceding paragraph, and took a bath, such as tearing, etc. the documents kept in the public service center, and used assaulting the victim B, such as tearing his breath, breath, flading the breath of working clothes, shreing the breath, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order was that the defendant agreed with the victim, even though there were many records of criminal punishment due to the crime of interference with business, the defendant again committed the crime of this case, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, circumstances of the crime, means and results, circumstances before and after the crime, etc. shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the conditions of sentencing specified in the records

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.