Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a worker dismissed by D, and is the director of the Korean Democratic Trade Union Federation of Workers' Unions of the Republic of Korea, which is a trade union.

On January 9, 2013, 200:19 Busan Shipping Daegu, the Defendant: G (47 years of age) a registered security guard who was working for a key national establishment “A” in the E-U.S. Busan, the E-U.S. workplace located in the F-U.S. Busan, “whether he accused the prosecution or not he accused the prosecution”; 2 through 3 times the victim’s inside part, etc.; 3 times the victim’s inside part, etc. were deducted from the victim’s her inside part; 2 times the victim’s inside part, etc.; 70 meters away from the office with the front door door door, and interfered with the legitimate performance of public duties of the police assigned for special guard, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the part of the inner part and the Gyeong-gu Gyeong-gu Gyeong-kin, which requires treatment of approximately two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of witness H, G, I, and J in the first trial record;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) 1 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant's defense counsel's assertion of the defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that the defendant's act does not constitute obstruction of the performance of official duties because the crime place of this case does not fall under the scope of the victim's duty, who is the police assigned for special guard, because the crime place of this case does not fall

The act of the defendant was conducted in and near the guard, the first place and the place of the inquiry to enter the facilities of the corporation E, which is classified as a key national establishment.