The sentence of sentence shall be suspended for the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “C”) operator operating the business of manufacturing Aluminium parts located in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, and the victim D (hereinafter referred to as “victim Association”) is a non-profit incorporated association established for the purpose of ensuring the safety of construction of provisional structures and developing the provisional industry. On December 3, 2012, the victim Association was entitled to conduct research and development projects in the non-domesticization of boiler system for boiler systems (hereinafter referred to as “the instant project”) from five development companies, including E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “five development companies”), and the said C was a company participating in the instant project, and was in charge of developing prototypes.

The Victim Association shall supply the primary product jointly developed with the defendant to EF power plants on February 28, 2014, and the same year from that time.

5. From August, 200 to August, 200, he installed the above products inside the boiler and carried out the maintenance work, but five power generators; and

6. Around 30. Around 30.m., the victim’s association sent a statement to the effect that “the period of research and development shall be extended, but no additional increase in research and development costs shall be made.”

Defendant for the same year

7. Around 15, when the victim association withdraws from the participant enterprise of the research and development agreement of this case and requires the victim association to pay expenses under the business agreement of this case, it takes out approximately 3,469,790 kgg (hereinafter “the product of this case”) equivalent to the market price of the victim association owned by the victim association, including the unit vision 9,444.6kg, supplied by the victim association to EF power plants, and takes out approximately 39,713.4 kg (hereinafter “the product of this case”) of the product of this case for the victim association, and the victim association has disputed the settlement of development costs between the victim association and the association. On July 11, 2016, the victim association filed a lawsuit against the above C with the Ulsan District Court to the effect that “the delivery of the product of this case to the victim association.”

June 14, 2017.