logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.05.15 2012고정5900
점유이탈물횡령등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around September 13, 201, the Defendant: (a) discovered one card of a new bank in the name of the victim who was lost by the victim B (the age of 64) within a 1,000,000 underground shopping district of Socheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, and then embezzled possession-si with the above new bank card with the intent of acquisition without taking necessary procedures, such as reporting it to the nearby police station; and (b) embezzled possession with the above new bank card with the intent of acquisition.

2. The Defendant was not the owner of a new bank card in the name of the victim, and even if used, there was no intent to pay the above card use price.

Nevertheless, around 05:24 September 10, 201, the Defendant, at around 05:24, caused a credit card company to prepare a credit card sales slip in the name of 600,000 won from the trade "C" located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and at the same place on the same day, the name of 50,000,000 won cannot be known to the members who obtained the credit card card in the name of 50,000 won, thereby inducing the Defendant to make a false signature on the card and inducing the Defendant to pay the same amount of money.

In such a way, from September 9, 201 to September 10, 2011, a credit card company received property equivalent to the same amount from each of the members of each store over a total of ten times, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table, and made a credit card company pay a total of KRW 2,945,200 of the purchase price.

3. The Defendant violated the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, as set forth in paragraph (1), illegally used credit cards in the name of B, which were lost after being provided property equivalent to a total of KRW 2,945,200 at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (2).

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement made against D and B;

1. The records of seizure and the list of seizure;

arrow