1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

The plaintiff is a police officer appointed as a policeman on July 21, 1984 and promoted to the Inspector on March 1, 2008.

The defendant conducted an investigation on the plaintiff (work period from July 12, 2016 to November 3, 2017) who worked as the head of the patrol team 2 patrol team in Seoul Gwanak Police Station B, and the plaintiff (work period: from November 12, 2016 to the duty period) who was a team member, and requested a resolution on disciplinary action against the plaintiff and C on November 3, 2017.

Police officers are obligated to maintain their dignity, observe Acts and subordinate statutes, and faithfully perform their duties, regardless of whether they are on or off their duties.

A person eligible for the service as the head of the patrol team at the Gwanak Police Station life safety and B patrol box - On March 5, 2017, three times among team guards C and work hours;

3.29.

7. Along with the public dispute over November 1, 200, the Bag, Egyptian, and Bagh were several years, and there were no fluorical, anti-end, and insulting remarks, such as “I ambi, I amba, and I amba, I amba, I am.” (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 1”).

) - Two staff members were able to see whether they were fryed at the house, as such, at the p.m. police station model. The head of the team appears to be a bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch, and were not able to receive family education, etc. (hereinafter “Disciplinary Grounds 2 of this case”).

- In spite of the fact that a member of the patrol team, such as an insulting speech to a certain employee on a certain day, should have led his/her subordinate employees to perform his/her duties well, he/she had the employee take a bath or speak, and made a character-specific statement (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 3 of this case”).

- Despite the fact that the chief of a police box and security guards who were the team leader and security guards C have been tried and tried to be tried by him/her, there was a dispute over three consecutive times due to mutual appraisal, and the remaining team members work for five months as the difference between the subjects and the team members C is not good.