1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 31, 1990, the Plaintiff was appointed as a policeman and promoted to the police officer on October 1, 2013. From February 14, 2014 to July 8, 2015, the Plaintiff served in the B police box from February 14, 2014 to July 8, 2015, and served in the C police box from July 9, 2015.

B. On July 14, 2015, the General Disciplinary Committee for Police Officers in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station decided on the Plaintiff’s disciplinary action for two-month salary reduction on the ground that the Plaintiff violated Articles 56 (Duty of Good Faith), 57 (Duty of Care in Good Faith), and 63 (Duty to Maintain Dignity) of the State Public Officials Act and constitutes grounds for disciplinary action under Article 78 (1) 1 through 3 of the State Public Officials Act.

The plaintiff recommended that B patrol team members of the team leader D to the team leader leader leader leader, and suggested that the team leader unity and practice were defective.

On July 7, 2015, around 19:20-21:30 a day-time work, and leave from office, while being aware of the vegetable garden with a view to cost saving, it purchased alcoholic beverages, such as juju, to the back vegetable garden E, Young-gu, Soung-gu, and moved to the Plaintiff, and seven members of the team participated.

Since then, D's demand for a substitute driving in the state of Mad', but failed to hear the degree of Mad'.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff Gcoin also boarded on the driver's seat of the vehicle, and the Plaintiff was on board the front line.

The head of the team assisted the police officer to drive a motor vehicle in the state of drinking on the ground that he/she changed the key of the motor vehicle to drive the plaintiff's vehicle in the state of drinking, and assist him/her to drive a motor vehicle without responsibility by a police officer, such as moving the motor vehicle to the chief of the police.

C. The defendant Na

On July 15, 2015, according to the resolution, the Plaintiff was subject to a disciplinary measure for two months of salary reduction. D.

The plaintiff is dissatisfied with this and filed an appeal with the appeals review committee, and the appeals review committee is against the plaintiff on October 30, 2015.