logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2013. 10. 18. 선고 2013누5489 판결
토지에서 수목을 생장・재배하는 등 토지를 직접 경작하였다고 봄이 상당함[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 2012Gudan779 ( October 16, 2013)

Title

It is reasonable to view that a person directly cultivated a parcel of land, such as growing and growing trees on the land.

Summary

In light of the fact that a landscape business is carried on for the sale of trees while growing trees, that a landscape business is received for the sale of trees, that is registered as farmland on the farmland ledger, that is, ornamental trees are entered in the ornamental trees, and that a considerable amount of revenue has been reported while carrying on the landscape business, etc., it is reasonable to deem that a person directly cultivated trees by growing trees or growing them on land.

Cases

2013Nu5489 Revocation of imposition of capital gains tax

Plaintiff, Appellant

KoreaA

Defendant, appellant and appellant

Head of Nowon Tax Office

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2012Gudan7779 decided January 16, 2013

Conclusion of Pleadings

October 1, 2013

Imposition of Judgment

October 18, 2013

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The Defendant’s disposition of imposition of the capital gains tax of 2009 against the Plaintiff on August 11, 201 is revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be cited, except for the part concerning "Article 69" in Part 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance as "Article 69."

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim seeking the cancellation of the disposition of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow