logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.03.22 2016고단58
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the indictment against insult is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 20, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of road traffic laws at the Ulsan District Court on April 20, 201, and on November 21, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of road traffic laws, etc. at the same court on November 21, 2013, and was sentenced to five times of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of road traffic laws on April 10, 2014.

1. On January 5, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) by driving a D-to-pubed car with about 1km alcohol concentration of about 0.129% from the 1km section to the front road, and again committing the same offense, as a person who violates the Road Traffic Act (d-to-pubing) more than twice, and committed the same offense.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on January 5, 2016, at around 21:44, the Nam-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., U.S. on the road of a middle school of 170 night, such as paragraph (1) from a slope E belonging to the traffic safety department of the Southern-gu Police Station, Ulsan-do, where he was subject to the influence of drinking on the road of a middle school of 170 night, and, to E, the Defendant: (a) was aware of the objection, such as the bitch bitch bitch, the bitch bitch bitch, the bitch bitch bitch, the bitch bitch bitch, the bitch bitch bitch, the bitch bitch son, the bitch son, etc., and (b) died to the right side of the horse, and (c) the Defendant died to the right side of the horse, such as the Defendant’s son.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the crackdown on drinking driving.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. A complaint;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Photographs 1.

arrow