logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.06.12 2018고단895
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years and six months from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On September 23, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of five million won on July 201, 201 to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) by the Ulsan District Court on September 23, 2014, and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking). The Defendant was sentenced to a fine of five million won on July 20, 2016 by the Ulsan District Court on July 20, 2016.

The Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content 0.091% in blood without a driver’s license. On December 4, 2017, the Defendant driven BK3 automobiles at a section of approximately 200 meters in front of the day in front of the day in front of the day in front of the day in the night-dong in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do.

As a result, the Defendant, who committed two or more times a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, while driving a motor vehicle without a driver's license.

2. On December 4, 2017, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) received a request for confirmation of personal information from D on the front of the night school located in Ulsan-dong, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, the Police Station Cream Team affiliated with the Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, Seoul-do, and notified the Defendant of the personal information of “E” without authority for the purpose of exercising; and (b) sent the Defendant’s personal information to the driver’s statement column of the driver’s statement in the circumstances of the driver’s statement.

After stating “E”, the signature was signed in the signature column, and forged one copy of the circumstantial report of the driver’s statement in the name of E on fact-finding.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place described in paragraph 2, submitted to the said D a copy of the State driver’s circumstantial statement report under the name of E, as described in paragraph 2, to which he was unaware of the circumstances.

4. The Defendant forged the signature of the Defendant, without authority, entered the name “E” in the signature column of the PDA (Carrying-on sign) under the influence of the Defendant’s signature at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, with the intent to exercise the name in the signature column of the PDA (Carrying-on sign) under the influence of alcohol.

5...

arrow