A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On November 1, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Gwangju District Court on November 11, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Gwangju District Court on May 27, 2016.

On September 13, 2017, at around 15:00, the Defendant appeared in the Daegu District Court 39, Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, as a witness of the fraud case against No. 155, the Defendant took an oath.

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that “B received KRW 127,900,00 from C for the purpose of land development investment in August 2008, and acquired it by fraud,” and the Defendant gave testimony as to the process of concluding a contract between B and C and the process of paying the money.

① When the Defendant received money from C, the Defendant her finites about D’s land development.

In the event of borrowing money, the term “influence,” did not so.

In order to find the site for the project in excess of the auction, I answer to ‘B', ‘B', ‘B', ‘E', ‘B', and ‘B', so I am 1,30,000 won.

(A) The B Chairperson may be aware of all, because the document is C and is written by the G accounting corporation and the two are written by the G accounting corporation.

The answer to the “I” and the “Is the Prosecutor’s Housing Site Development” at all C, and Isn't have to do so.

The term "in the last place of questions," is the same as C and G accounting corporation's office work, and the bonds company's business." Therefore, it was the first day of this day.

(4) The public prosecutor’s question whether the D land development is no superior in the course of receiving the said money at present, and the land development is frighten.

The answer to "," and the prosecutor's "this investment agreement is prepared accurately."