A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On September 2, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. at the Incheon District Court on September 2, 201, which became final and conclusive on December 3, 201, and is currently under the suspended sentence.

The Defendant, from February 2, 2012 to August 2012, 2012, operated a sexual traffic business establishment under 206 of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the building in Bupyeong-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul, and provided two rooms used for sexual traffic, and employed female employees D, E, etc. over the said period.

The defendant had found the above business establishment during the above period, by receiving 30,000 won to 35,000 won per man in return for sexual traffic from the male grandchildren who had found the above business establishment during the above period, and had the above female employees take the sexual organ of the male grandchildren by hand, and by allowing the above female employees to see the scams as follows, arrange sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D or E by the prosecution;

1. Photographs, etc. of the business;

1. Investigation report (report on attachment, such as the lease contract, etc. of this case, report on attachment of suspect DNA mobile phone letters and merials, confirmation of subscriber's personal information by the telephone number of the business establishment engaging in sexual traffic, and report on attachment of telephone number of the business establishment

1. Previous records: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, investigation reports (Attachment to reports on criminal acts of the same kind A)

1. The nature of the crime is very high, solely because the defendant, in spite of the same kind of business as the defendant had several times of sentencing, has resumed the same type of business even though the reason for sentencing the sentence of imprisonment was committed, and the conclusion of the judgment in this case is at the risk of invalidation of suspended sentence due to the final judgment in this case, the defendant seems to have led to confession and reflect all of the crimes at the latest, and other factors such as the defendant's family environment and other power.