logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 04. 12. 선고 2016두30743 판결
부가세법상 면세용역으로서의 ‘그 밖의 금전대부업’인지 면세 대상이 아닌 ‘투자중개업’인지[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2014-Nu-73083 ( December 02, 2015)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High-2012-Seoul Government-3012 ( November 08, 2013)

Title

Whether it is "other money credit business" as tax-free service under the Value-Added Tax Act or "investment brokerage business" not subject to tax-free exemption.

Summary

It constitutes an investment brokerage business that allows a customer to use an account to engage in futures or options transactions and to engage in transactions.

Related statutes

Article 11 of the Value-Added Tax Act

Cases

2016Du30743 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Value-Added Tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

AA Corporation

Defendant-Appellee

BB Director of the Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2014Nu73083 Decided December 2, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

2016.04.12

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

arrow