logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.05.15 2018고정289
사기방조
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was aware of the fact that 500,000 won and 10 copies of the other person’s resident registration, etc., such as the Defendant’s resident registration, etc., and 10 copies and abstractss of the other person’s name were issued as well as 10 copies of the certificate of personal seal impression, and the Defendant was established as BB corporation using the NA documents, and around that time, the Defendant opened a bank account in the name of the said corporation (Account Number: C) with the knowledge of the fact that the name influence, etc. was recruited for the purpose of using the account with respect to the crime, including fraud; and (b) on February 19, 2016, the name influence was established by using the NA documents.

On April 8, 2016, the name Buddhistist will sell a liquid camp in a country where he/she is Internet NAB and will sell it.

The phrase " shall be inserted to the effect that the above goods will be sold to the victim D who has reported the fact, and the price shall be paid to the victim D.

A false statement was made.

However, even if the person who has lost the name was paid the price from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the goods.

The name influor has received a total of 2,710,000 won from the six victims, including by deceiving the victim and receiving 420,000 won from the foreign exchange bank account in the name of the foreign exchange bank account in the name of the foreign exchange bank account opened as above from the victim.

As above, the Defendant: (a) issued ten copies such as the Defendant’s name registration; and (b) issued ten copies of the certificate of personal seal impression; and (c) assisted the Defendant’s act of fraud of the Defendant’s nameless winners by facilitating the commission of the crime of the nameless winners.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement protocol with respect to E;

1. Application of the F’s written laws and regulations;

1. Article 347 (1) and Article 32 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow