beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, for a year of imprisonment for a defendant B, and for a period of ten months of imprisonment for a defendant C, respectively.
except that this shall not apply.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. From January 2014, Defendant A, who was a similar recipient company, from around 1, 2014, around January 2015, the first and the J, introduced the said company to investors, attracting investments, while the Defendant paid interest to investors, and was in charge of managing investors in around May 2015, Defendant A, a similar recipient company run by K, was in exclusive charge of receiving L by the said method (State).
A. On May 21, 2015, K and (State)L office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government M around May 21, 2015, the Defendant purchased rice from the victim N through a transaction with the unit agricultural cooperative, and supplied it, thereby holding at least 10% high profit per week.
In other words, once the delivery takes place, 2-3% of the amount of profit per week, and 4-5% of the amount of profit per week. Thus, when the delivery takes place, at least 10% of the amount of profit per week, it is false that the amount of profit per week should be paid within a short period of time, including the principal amount.
However, at the time (State) L did not make any profit through the transaction of agricultural and livestock products, so it did not carry out the business of supplying agricultural and livestock products as a return name, which is paid by investors to the prior investors as a profit. In fact, most of the investments were used for the “return prevention” or reinvestment in the automobile parts business and cosmetics business that are entirely unrelated to the business of agricultural and livestock products, and there was no other way to pay large-scale profits through the transaction of agricultural and livestock products. Therefore, even if the money was paid from the injured party as above, there was no intention or ability to reduce the profit as promised.
Nevertheless, the Defendant conspired with K.