1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is next to the judgment of the first instance.

The decision of the court of first instance is the same as that of the decision of the court of first instance, except for the modification as stated in paragraph 2 and the addition of the decision in the next trial as stated in paragraph 2.

B. 1) From the end of the second judgment of the first instance court to the “Plaintiff” of the fifth conduct, the amendment is just to add “(the name prior to the opening was “K,” and the 5th instance judgment added “B” under Articles 11 and 12 to “B” under Articles 5, 11, and 12. (2) The 6th judgment of the first instance court, 10 of the 6th judgment of the first instance court, i.e., “F., the 10th judgment” under the 10th judgment of the first instance court, i.e., “A., the entry of evidence No. 10-3,” and then add “the 11th judgment is insufficient,” and “the 5th judgment is different.”

3) Upon the end of the judgment of the first instance court, the “place” is added in front of the “order” of the first instance, and the “place” is not sufficient to recognize the “A” only with the entries of No. 10-3” in front of the same line of conduct. 4) The judgment of the first instance court No. 8 (hereinafter the same shall apply to “hereinafter”) includes the number, except where the number is indicated particularly in particular.

5) From the end of the 13th judgment of the first instance court, “No evidence exists to acknowledge it” means that “No evidence is sufficient to acknowledge it by itself with the entries of No. 15, and no other evidence exists to acknowledge it. 6) Personally “No. 14th judgment of the first instance court,” and “No evidence exists to deem that the Plaintiff violated any statute or official duty,” of the second and second acts at the end of the 15th judgment,” the entry of No. 10-2 by “No. 10-2, it is insufficient to deem that the Plaintiff violated any relevant statute or official duty, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.”

7. The 16th judgment of the first instance is in accordance with the 12,13th judgment.