1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

On September 30, 2016, the Defendant’s dismissal against the Plaintiffs.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasons why the court should explain the cited part of this case are as follows.

The decision of the first instance is identical to that of the first instance court, except for the revision of the judgment of the first instance and addition of the judgment in the second instance as referred to in the following paragraph (2), and it is citing it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420

(However, as the plaintiffs did not appeal against the judgment of the court of first instance against the claim for consolation money, this part is excluded from the scope of this court's trial, the part concerning the claim for consolation money in the judgment of the court of first instance is excluded from the above cited part).

1) Parts 1 of the first instance court’s decision: (a) deleted the overall heading 16, 17 of the first instance court’s 3; (b) added “28 persons, including the Plaintiff” in the front of the 19th judgment; (c) removed “this court” in the first instance court’s 16th judgment as “the Commission” in the first instance court’s 8th 16th 16th ; and (d) “Ethy” in the same parallel as “Ethy Ethy” in the first instance court’s 19th 19th “from July 14, 2014 to “from July 14, 2014,” and (c) removed “12,15,17” in the first instance court’s 19th 2nd 4th 2nd 1st 4th 2nd 1st 3th 4th 3th 19th 2nd 2nd 4th 2nd 2nd 14th 3th 3th 1st 3th 2nd 3.