logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.10.26 2018나2003920
면직(파면)처분 무효
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasons why the court should explain the cited part of this case are as follows.

The decision of the first instance is identical to that of the first instance court, except for the revision of the judgment of the first instance and addition of the judgment in the second instance as referred to in the following paragraph (2), and it is citing it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420

[However, the Plaintiff’s withdrawal of paragraphs (1) and (2) of the existing procedural defect assertion in the trial (see, e.g., the first page of the preparatory document dated April 9, 2018), and its assertion and determination are excluded from the above cited part].

1) From the end of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part 1) is deemed to be “in existence,” and the part 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance to be “assumed,” the “assumed,” the “assumed, etc. of the second behavior,” and the “assumed, etc. of the 8th page 16,” the “assumed, etc. of the 19th page 19,” and the “assumed,” the “assumed, etc. of the 19th page 22 (including any number other than the case where the number is indicated especially in the case where the number is indicated; hereinafter, the “this court” is deemed to be “the court of first instance” and the “assumed,” the “assumed evidence” of the 9th judgment of the court of first instance, No. 6, No. 52, and the “assumed,” the “assumed from No. 17 and No. 18,” to “in fact” to the Plaintiff did not have any evidence that it was deposited into the account.

3 Then, the first instance court's decision 10 No. 10 is just about the second sentence, and see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 97Nu18189, Nov. 10, 1998; 201Da18189, Nov. 10, 201; and 3) add each “ even if a part of the order is recognized,” in the front of the third sentence, to “a case where a part of the order is recognized,” and 3) add each “a case where a part of the order is

2. The instant case, as seen in the above cited part of the additional judgment.

arrow