beta
Text
1. Defendant B’s KRW 1,766,951,494 as well as 5% per annum from June 29, 2015 to May 31, 2018, and the following:
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a company established for the purpose of marine transportation services, etc., and E is a person who served in the Plaintiff’s accounting and accounting and accounting and accounting team for about 28 years from January 5, 1987 to September 18, 2015.
B. On November 16, 198, E married with Defendant B on October 11, 2001, but divorced on October 11, 2001. On December 20, 2001, E divorced on March 18, 201.
E maintained internal relations with Defendant C, who had been a golf instructor of himself and F, from July 2014 to September 18, 2015, who had been married with F.
Defendant D is a middle school colon of F.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 51 (including virtual number), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Part of the claim against the defendant B
A. The parties asserted (1) Plaintiff E embezzled money of KRW 7,457,656,30 for five years from January 28, 201 to June 29, 2015 by taking advantage of the status of exclusively managing all affairs of the Plaintiff’s financial management team.
Defendant B, as the former wife of E, was well aware of the circumstances of remitting money by preparing it by unlawful means, such as embezzlement of Company E’s funds, or obtained stolen money by receiving KRW 1,164,541,000 out of the above embezzlement money from E with implied recognition, and then, acquired stolen money by aiding and abetting it. After the death of E, KRW 621,00,000, out of the money remaining in the account in the name of E in order to evade the Plaintiff’s compulsory execution.
The defendant B's act constitutes a joint tort with E, and even if not, the defendant B has a duty to compensate or return to the plaintiff for the total sum of KRW 1,785,541,000,00, which was acquired from E, since the defendant B had no legal ground to gain profits equivalent to the above amount.
(2) The Plaintiff’s management that Defendant B’s assertion E could have withdrawn a large amount of money during the short period of time.