logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.10.11 2018고정1122
재물손괴
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

가. 피고인은 2017. 9. 17. 20:01 경 서울 노원구 C 아파트 D 승강기에서 피해자 E이 부착하여 둔 ‘C 입주민 여러 분 유언비어에 속으실 껀 가요 ’ 라는 제목의 아파트 배관공사의 문제점을 지적하는 게시물을 게시대에서 빼내

was made.

B. On September 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) deducted the Defendant from the posted stand the notice indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a) from the elevator described in the foregoing paragraph (a) on September 21, 2017.

was made.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

2. Defendant B

가. 피고인은 2017. 9. 26. 20:18 경 서울 노원구 C 아파트 F 동 승강기에서 피해자 E이 부착하여 둔 ‘C 입주민 여러 분 유언비어에 속으실 껀 가요 ’ 라는 제목의 아파트 배관공사의 문제점을 지적하는 게시물을 게시대에서 빼내

was made.

B. On September 27, 2017, the Defendant, at the place indicated in the above 2-A on September 27, 2017, deducted the notice indicated in the above 2-A from the posting stand.

was made.

(c)

On September 29, 2017, the Defendant, at the place indicated in the above-mentioned 2-a-paragraph (a) around September 29, 2017, deducted the posts described in the above 2-a-paragraph (a) from the posted stand.

was made.

(d)

피고인은 2017. 9. 29. 11:23 경 서울 노원구 C 아파트 F 동 복도에서 피해자 E이 그 곳 벽면에 부착한 ‘C 입주민 여러 분 유언비어에 속으실 껀 가요 ’ 라는 제목의 아파트 배관공사의 문제점을 지적하는 게시물을 뜯어 내 었다.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A criminal investigation report (CCTV verification);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act for the increase of concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the Defendants and their defense counsel’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of each of the Criminal Procedure Act in the provisional payment order

1. The apartment house in which the alleged defendants reside.

arrow