Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a resident of Heung-gu E apartment in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, and Victim F is the head of the management office of the above apartment.

A. On November 9, 2016, around 20:05, the Defendant set up a notice on the elevator No. 104-3 of the above E apartment, and set up a notice on the “written opinion of the head of the management office related to the affairs of the committee for election management under progress,” which is the victim’s possession on the bulletin board, and damaged the property owned by the victim.

B. On November 9, 2016, around 21:29, the Defendant removed a notice of “written opinion on the management office related to the affairs of the committee for election management under progress,” which is the victim’s possession in the elevator No. 107-4, the above E apartment No. 107-dong 4, and on the bulletin board, and damaged the property owned by the victim.

(c)

On November 21, 2016, around 21:52, the Defendant opened a notice on the elevator No. 109-4 of the above E apartment, and opened a notice to the managing director’s opinion related to the affairs of the committee for election management under progress, which is the victim’s possession in the elevator No. 109-4 of the said E apartment, the Defendant damaged the property owned by the victim.

2. Defendant B is a resident of Heung-gu E apartment in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, and F is the head of the management office of the above apartment.

On November 9, 2016, at around 22:06, the Defendant stated that the charges of holding the representative meeting of occupants of the above E apartment complex attached by F on the bulletin board at the place is owned by F. However, the above notice is a public notice given in the name of the person performing the duties of the representative meeting of occupants of the above apartment complex, and it is reasonable to deem that it is owned by the representative meeting of occupants. This does not interfere with the Defendant’s exercise of the right to defense.

The notice referred to in the title "public notice on the result of the 74th meeting of occupants (temporary-emergency)" was removed, and the property owned by the victim was damaged.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to F;

1. Each victim;