logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.11.18 2015나3904
위자료
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The fact that the defendant was prosecuted for the following facts constituting the crime and was pronounced guilty guilty is not disputed between the parties, or it can be acknowledged by considering the whole purport of the pleadings as a whole in the statement in subparagraph 1-1, 2, and 3.

Criminal facts

1. From Jun. 13, 2012 to Jun. 15, 2012, the Defendant: (a) from Jun. 13, 2012 to Jun. 15, 2010, the 110-dong apartment units 110, 111 entrance bulletin boards and 4 elevator entrance doors; and (b) the resident car parked in the underground parking lot, etc., “The president of the council of occupants’ representatives cannot be viewed as vehicles and horses because there are many problems due to the lack of management ability and conduct; and (c) it is no longer possible to view that the president of the council of occupants’ representatives as a vehicle for the development of our apartment units, as stated below the thickness of the residents; and (d) it is not unreasonable to distinguish the construction from the head of the council of occupants’ representatives; and (d) from the head of the management staff of the management staff to the effect that the management staff would be able to take part in the bidding for a long time without any consistency in the operation of the council of occupants.

However, there is no fact that the victim A orders the apartment management staff to rent his/her own car, and some members of the tenant representative meeting have resigned.

arrow