logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.01.26 2016고단2529
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant was married to the victim D, who was inside a usual school in Japan and operated the bond business in Japan, and was living together with the defendant, as the head of the family in Japan.

In order to acquire money by deception, it was intended to acquire money.

1. On December 10, 2015, the Defendant wishes to live in the victim’s house located in Japan, Japan around December 10, 2015, for the victim to have the victim divorced from the Defendant’s wife due to the lack of any circumstances.

If we lend 50,000 UN (Korean Won 5,00,000) to secure a high-class visual view of both men and women, we will return the high-class visual view to the party and pay the money to the party.

In addition, the phrase “a person who lives together in the same way and uses in the same way as the high-class visibility” was false.

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he did not intend to live together with the injured party.

As above, the Defendant had the victim by deceiving the victim and had the victim receive 500,000 UN (Korean Won 5 million) from the victim.

2. On December 15, 2015, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant, at the Kimpo Airport located in Gangseo-gu, Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 38, the Defendant married the victim “a person who lives together by marriage with 10 million UN (Korean Won KRW 100 million) so that 2 children in the Republic of Korea have no specific occupation.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention to live together with the injured party, and there was no intention or ability to operate the F carpet.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim and was delivered 10 million UN (Korean Won KRW 100 million) from the victim.

3. On December 29, 2015, the Defendant, at the victim’s home located in Japan, concluded on December 29, 2015, that “The Defendant, at the victim’s home, determined that “I will live together with us in Korea, pay the balance of 8 million UN (Korean Won KRW 80 million) where I have to supply the remainder of her office in Korea, and in that officetel, I will live together in that officetel.”

However, the defendant is in fact injured.

arrow