logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.08.09 2018고단1918
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around April 12, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic (sexual traffic) committed sexual intercourse by receiving approximately KRW 50,000 from E at the D hotel located in the ASEAN of Japan and engaging in sexual intercourse once.

2. The Defendant, as described in the foregoing paragraph 1, was aware of the Japanese victim E (E, 52 years of age) by engaging in sexual traffic as indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1, and was committed as if the Defendant was married to the victim who had a sense of view to the Defendant, and was able to obtain money in the name of the Defendant’s repayment and deposit money for the collection of sexual traffic.

A. On May 20, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim of Japan, stating that “In order to marry, there has been 3250,000 UN bonds in Korea, and the Defendant must first settle this money.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any debt equivalent to 3.25 million UN (Korean Won 32.5 million won) in Korea, and there was no intention to marry with the victim.

On May 24, 2017, the Defendant was delivered 3.250,000 UN on the pretext of the repayment of the Defendant’s debentures in the car of the victim of the damage in the Dok Ka Ka Ka Ka Kana Station, Japan around May 24, 2017.

B. On May 27, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim at G Authorized Brokerage Office located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, stating that “The Defendant placed down payment of KRW 1 million on the Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, which entered into a marriage with her marriage and with a house of her death, and that the Defendant shall pay the remainder of 24.9 million, and prepare it.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he did not intend to pay the balance of the deposit before the said new marriage, and there was no intention to marry with the injured party.

On May 30, 2017, the Defendant received delivery of 25,100,000 UN (Korean Won KRW 2550,000,00) from the injured party through the refunded flag business operator around 15:30 on May 30, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against E;

1. An investigation report (H interview with a lending company that consumes the amount acquired by a suspect A),

arrow