logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2017.09.26 2017고단536
업무방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, between two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On April 28, 2017, Defendant A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspension of execution on May 9, 2017 in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 28, 2017.

[Criminal facts] "2017 Highest 536"

1. Around March 26, 2017, Defendant A’s business interfered with the victim’s multiple businesses by referring to the “F” operated by the victim E in Guro-si on the ground that the said multiple employees called to the effect that they would have repaid the credit amount to the Defendant, and by referring the said multiple employees to the said multiples, “hyp hyp h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h

"2017 Highest 837"

2. On January 18, 2017, Defendant A’s violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) driven a G Poter II truck without obtaining a driver’s license from around 37 degrees from the 37-lanes of the Si/Gu-U.S. Si-S. Si-S. Si Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si

3. Defendant B’s violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (do referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes”), around 18:50 on January 18, 2017, the Defendant driving a H-wing and II cargo vehicle, thereby proceeding the three-dimensional distance from the one-way side to the new one-way side.

In such cases, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the front left left and right and the brake system for the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and caused the victim I (the age of 74) who was walking along the road on the right part of the above cargo vehicle due to negligence.

Ultimately, even if the Defendant suffered a multiple trauma where the number of days of treatment cannot be known due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant immediately stops and the victim is the victim.

arrow