logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.06.22 2017고단1045
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 16, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) and the Guarantee of Compensation for Motor Vehicle Damages (hereinafter “Act”) driving the D D multi-user vehicle owned by the Defendant, which was not covered by mandatory insurance without a driver’s license, on around eight kilometers from the fall market in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Songpa-gu to the front end of the Manam-si, Manam-si, Manam-si, Manam-si.

2. On June 16, 2016, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) on the street B in front of the Manam-si, Sungnam-si; (b) on the same day, the Defendant controlled vehicles not covered by mandatory insurance while driving the said vehicle.

E The police box is not in possession of identification cards at the request of the police officer F to produce identification cards, and to prevent the Defendant from passing through fines.

After the end of the false statement, the resident registration number of the defendant-friendly recruitment G was given to the illegal use of another person's resident registration number.

3. On June 16, 2016, the Defendant forged the G name’s signature without authority for the purpose of exercising the right as “G”’s signature on the column, which is a statement at the end of the said vehicle’s operation report, in front of 09:38, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, requiring the Defendant to sign on the vehicle’s operation report from the Gyeongnam-si F.

4. On June 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 09:38, at the street B before Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si; (b) submitted a false signature to the light F, who is aware of the forgery of the signature, as if the name of the name of G entered in the said vehicle’s operational statement was genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of the operation of G vehicle;

1. Mandatory insurance inquiries and status of entry or departure of each individual;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing vehicles;

1. Article 152 Subparag. 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 152 Subparag. 1 and Article 46 of the Guarantee of Automobile Damages.

arrow