The judgment below

All parts of the compensation order, except the compensation order, shall be reversed.

Defendant is the first and second crimes as indicated in the judgment of the court below.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that each sentence imposed on the defendant (two years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes in the first and second crimes in the judgment of the court below, and one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes in the third and fourteen months in the judgment of the court below) is too unreasonable

2. The Defendant had a record of criminal punishment for fraud committed by deceiving money through the Internet in the same way as each of the crimes of this case before the judgment was rendered. On May 23, 2006 and October 9, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for eight months on January 26, 201 due to the scambling of sale of the Internet goods, and the victims were tried after completion of the execution of the sentence, but the victims did not appear in court and were sentenced to punishment by the same way as the crime of this case, and even after being released from court, the execution of the sentence was completed, the Defendant committed the crime of this case under the same method as in the same manner as the crime of this case. On August 12, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to punishment for eight months on the ground of the scambling of the sale of the Internet goods, but it was recognized that the victims did not suffer from the crime of this case, such as providing an unspecified agreement to the victims, and that they did not have any false transportation of the victims during a considerable period of fraud.

However, in the case of the crime Nos. 1 and 2 of the judgment, it seems that the defendant made efforts to recover damage by delivering goods agreed to sell to some victims or returning part of the amount of damage.