logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.07.03 2014노99
사문서위조등
Text

The judgment below

Among them, the part concerning the crime of No. 4, 6, and 8 of the judgment against Defendant A shall be reversed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by the Defendants and the prosecutor is that the punishment of the court below (in the case of crimes No. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 in the judgment of the court below), the punishment of the court below (in the case of crimes No. 1, 3, 5, and 7 in the judgment of the court below), the punishment of the court below (in the case of crimes No. 4 in the judgment of the court below, the crime No. 4 in the case of crimes No. 4 in the judgment of the court below, the crime No. 6 in the case

2. Determination

A. (1) Determination of the grounds for appeal by Defendant A and the prosecutor (1) of the judgment of the court below on the assertion of unreasonable sentencing regarding the crimes No. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 as indicated in the judgment of the court below is the confession of all of the crimes in this part and the depth of each of these crimes, and there is a previous conviction in the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and there is a need to consider equity with the case where the said judgment is rendered concurrently with the crime for which the said judgment has become final and conclusive.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) there are many kinds of records that Defendant A was punished for committing a crime of the same kind of law; and (b) the damage recovery was not fully performed until the trial at the trial; and (c) other various circumstances, such as Defendant A’s age, character, character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (d) the circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the present arguments and records, are not deemed to be too heavy or less to the extent that the sentence imposed on Defendant A for each of the crimes

Therefore, the defendant A and the prosecutor's argument on this part of the crime is without merit.

(2) Of the judgment of the court below, there are many kinds of records of the judgment on the assertion of unreasonable sentencing on the crime No. 4, 6, and 8 of the judgment of the court below, and the fact that the defendant A committed this part during the period of suspended execution, etc. are disadvantageous to the defendant A.

However, the defendant A confessions all of the crimes in this part and depth.

arrow