The judgment below

Each of the crimes of No. 1 in the holding, each of the crimes of No. 2, No. 2, and No. 3 through No. 4 in the holding.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the crime in the table of crime No. 2 (2) : fine of one million won: the crime in the holding; the crime in the table of crime No. 1; the crime in the holding No. 2 (2) 2 through 4; and the crime in the holding No. 3 through No. 7: imprisonment of six months) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case was committed by the Defendant by deceiving a number of victims as if the Defendant sold the goods using the Internet site, and the crime was not significantly good, and the Defendant was punished several times due to the fraud of the same veterinary act (three times a fine and one time a suspended sentence of imprisonment), and in particular, on April 1, 201, the Defendant committed the crime of this case under Article 1, which was sentenced to two years of a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for six months for fraud in the Changwon District Court branch branch branch of the Changwon District Court on April 9, 201, and was sentenced to two years of a suspended sentence as of April 9, 201, while the suspended sentence became final and conclusive on April 9, 201, each of the crimes of this case under Articles 2, 2, 2, 3, and 7 of the judgment, and each of the crimes under Articles 3 through 7 of the judgment is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

On the other hand, if a judgment was rendered concurrently with the crime of first head of the crime as stated in the judgment of the court, the confession and reflect of the defendant, the fact that the defendant has compensated for all damages to the victims in the court below and the court below, the fact that the defendant is in the position to support the mother, and the crime No. 2 of the crime No. 1 of the judgment of the court below is the circumstance favorable to the defendant.

In full view of the above circumstances, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence, environment, and other various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, the sentence imposed on the crime No. 2 (2) No. 1 in the judgment of the court below cannot be deemed unfair because it is unreasonable, and the sentence imposed on the crime No. 1 in the judgment, the crimes No. 2 (2) 2 through 4 in the judgment of the court below, and the crimes No. 3 through 7 in the judgment of the court below is deemed unfair.

3...