logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.11.11 2015고단5654
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B’s fine of 3,00,000 won, Defendant C, D, and E shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging the exchange or repurchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

1. On January 2015, Defendant A: (a) installed 90 games in the mutual game room, such as “salwing club”, “exponsor”, “exponsor”, and “high stones”, and (b) took charge of the employment of employees, settlement of profits, and overall management of the game room; and (c) the J shared the role of the Defendant in cash exchange with the cards with the points obtained by customers, while working on money exchange.

From January 2015 to April 6, 2015, the Defendant, in collusion with J, had many unspecified customers who find a place in the said game place enter cash in the said game machine, let them use it, and had them exchange the points that they acquired in the said game machine less 10% of commission from the money exchange merchants'J outside the said game place.

2. Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant E’s aiding and abetting Defendants worked as an employee on condition that 80,000 won per day will be paid in the above game site from January 2, 2015 to April 6, 2015, while being aware that the Defendants are engaging in money exchange business by offering 10% of the game outcome obtained from customers on the game room as described in the above paragraph 1. However, even though they know that they are engaged in money exchange business, they confirmed the settlement points of unspecified multiple customers in the game room, and made it easy for the said Defendants to commit the crime by cleaning the game room and the heart.

As a result, the Defendants aided and abetted the Defendants’ acts of violating the Game Industry Promotion Act as stated in the above 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol of examination of the suspect against the defendant A, B, and E (the second time for the defendant A);

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding Defendant C

1. The police statement of K;

1. On-site photographs; 1.

arrow