logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.08.23 2017가단121145
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim and the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s counterclaim are all dismissed.

2. Of the costs of lawsuit.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed a principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of each entry in Gap evidence 1, 2, 7, and 11 (including paper numbers) and the entire purport of the pleadings:

On June 9, 2015, the Plaintiff, a female of Chers, was admitted to the “D Hospital” operated by the Defendant with the pain of the right knee, and the medical doctor E, an employee of the Defendant, diagnosed the Plaintiff’s disease as a hiveritis and gave treatment to the Plaintiff’s disease, thereby performing the hiversization to the mission, the right hivers of which is the right hivers.

Accordingly, on July 8, 2015, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the above hospital, and following the surgery from the above E to the right slife slife slife. E used the slife slife slife slife slife slife slife slife slife slife slife slife slife slife.

(hereinafter the Plaintiff received the above surgery from E (hereinafter referred to as “instant surgery”). B.

After the instant surgery, the Plaintiff complained of the loss of the right-hand bridge’s root and the depreciation of the room of the Plaintiff’s right-hand bridge, and E skne caused the pressure roof which the Plaintiff opened on the operation department, and skne kne to the right-hand 30-60∑.

C. However, the Plaintiff’s symptoms were not dead, and E conducted physical therapy and scopic psychotropic therapy from July 13, 2015, and following the day, the Plaintiff was performing treatment for scopic damage, such as prescribing the scopic agents and requiring the scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics to wear a scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic sc

The Plaintiff received hospitalized treatment at the “D Hospital” as of January 21, 2016 for the reduction of the right-hand bridge, loss of root, and pain, which occurred after the instant surgery, from January 21, 2016. From January 21, 2016 to February 16, 2016, the Plaintiff was hospitalized at the “G Hospital” and was hospitalized at the “G Hospital” from January 21, 2016, and from March 7, 2016.

3. Until December, 199, “H hospital” was hospitalized in the hospital, but still up to now.

arrow