1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid in addition to the following shall be revoked.

1. The facts under the recognition do not conflict between the parties, or are recognized by each entry of Gap evidence of heading A 1 to 31, Eul evidence of heading 1 to 21 (including numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

(1) The Plaintiff is a company that pays royalties to the Gutru, Rotten, etc. and sells trademarks, such as Gutru, Hasheas, etc., on the Gutru, Hasheas, etc. manufactured by itself.

The defendant is a company that sells Anglas et al.

(2) The Plaintiff entered into a product supply contract with the Defendant from December 2009 to December 2013, and supplied the products, such as glass.

(hereinafter “instant product supply contract”). The Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with 4,919 old GG3530/F/S products among the GG3530/S products released in August 201, and received the payment therefor, on the following terms:

(1) In this regard, the aforementioned product is “the instant letter” and the part of the limited supply agreement, such as Paragraph (2), among them, is supplied preferentially to the Defendant up to 5,000. (1) The instant letter is supplied preferentially to the Defendant.

No exchange or return is allowed for the above model.

(2) The Plaintiff may sell without restriction (the normal sales of the department stores are KRW 515,00 per unit year) at the department stores, but the other transaction parties may sell only up to five by SKU.

Models: Guide 3530 (Closts: Blosts, Blods, Blods: 5,000 terms: 5,00 Guide 3530 models, other than department stores, shall not supply them to Korea (Korea) except 5 knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife 201.

The letter of this case returned 588 around April 2012, 600 around December 2012, and 1,200 in total.

The transaction was interrupted on December 27, 2013, and the product price that the Plaintiff had not received from the Defendant at the time was 230,154,90 won.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant product price”)

(3) Does.