1. The Defendant’s KRW 68,241,923 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 6% from January 1, 2014 to November 28, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. (i) The Plaintiff is a company that pays royalties to the Guide, Rotten et al., and sells the trademark to the Guide, Rotten et al. and attach the trademark to the Guide tegrhum, tegical license, etc.; and the Defendant is a company that sells algrhum, egral license,

B. The Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with the instant products, such as written letters, from December 2009 to December 2013.

As of December 27, 2013, which was the date of discontinuance of transaction, the price for the goods that the Plaintiff had not received from the Defendant is 230,154,90 won in total.

(hereinafter) The above supply contract between the plaintiff and the defendant is a contract for the supply of the goods of this case, and the balance of the above price is the price of the goods of this case.

Abstract The Plaintiff: (a) provided the Gu’s G3530/F/S products in the course of supplying goods to the Defendant on August 201, as KRW 204,765 per unit; and (b) provided 4,919 in the supply key under the following conditions; and (c) received the full payment of the price:

(A) In the following, the foregoing product is called the instant letter, and the part of the limited supply agreement is the instant agreement. From April 2012 to December 2012, 2012, the sum of Chapter 588 around December 2012 and Chapter 1200 around December 2012 were returned. The instant letter is preferentially supplied to the Defendant up to 5,00.

No exchange or return is allowed for the above model.

The Plaintiff may sell (the normal sales of the department stores may be KRW 515,00 per unit year) without restriction, but the other transaction parties may sell up to five by SKU only.

Models: Guide 3530 (Closts: Blosts, Blods, Blods: 5,000 terms: 5,00 Guide 3530 models, other than department stores, shall not supply them to Korea (Korea) except 5 knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife 201.

B. (i) The Plaintiff’s violation of the agreement (i.e., the Plaintiff, from the end of 2011 to the end of 2013, shall be limited to 3,072 domestic business partners, excluding department stores.