logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.05.21 2015노83
업무방해등
Text

All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1) The apartment of Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul, including mistake of facts D (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

(D) 13 representatives for each Dong (hereinafter collectively referred to as “D, etc.”).

A) On or around April 9, 2013, at the management office of the instant apartment on or around April 12, 2013, a special meeting of the council of occupants’ representatives (hereinafter “special meeting of this case”) of the instant apartment is deemed to be an extraordinary meeting of the council of occupants’ representatives of the instant apartment.

(2) Although the Defendant notified that he would hold the instant special meeting was in violation of the procedure of convening the special meeting, the Defendant accepted the request of D, etc. for convening the special meeting on April 11, 2013, and convened the special meeting on April 11, 2013. D, etc. failed to attend the special meeting on the grounds of their personal circumstances, etc., and then intended to hold the instant special meeting on April 12, 2013, without arbitrarily excluding the Defendant, who is the chairman of the council of occupants’ representatives of the instant apartment, on the grounds that the Defendant did not avoid holding the special meeting of this case, the lower court determined that “(D, etc.) to hold the instant special meeting upon the request of 13 of the representatives of each Dong, from among 18 representatives of each Dong, on the ground that it did not constitute “the instant special meeting” as part of the consultation on the agenda of this case, and thus, did not constitute “the instant special meeting” as part of the consultation on the construction of the instant building and the instant special meeting.

arrow