1. As to the Plaintiff’s KRW 24,280,50, and KRW 12,330,50 among them, Defendant Qatro shall be from June 5, 2010, and KRW 11,950.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the modified environment of the Plaintiff Company and A (hereinafter, referred to as the Plaintiff’s vehicle).

B. On April 16, 2010, around 01:35, the Plaintiff’s driver: (a) 644 Dong-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, was driving on the road as a lot store in the lux basin; (b) Defendant Meart used the vehicle for filing a complaint to find out the first signal number of the first signal number assigned by Defendant Meart to prevent 1,2 lanes from 40 to 50 meters off the four-lanes; and (c) then rapidly changed the car line and caused a traffic accident that shocks the right side wall (hereinafter “traffic accident in this case”).

C. The street lamps and protective walls are destroyed due to the instant traffic accident, and some protective walls fall under a higher level, and the facilities are damaged on the wind covering the packaging horse operated by C, and C et al. suffered injury.

According to the instant accident, the Plaintiff paid KRW 8,900,000 to C, etc. for the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, KRW 14,861,00 for the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and KRW 24,800 for the treatment cost of C, etc. and agreed amount KRW 48,561,00 for the total of KRW 24,800

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 8 (including paper numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul's evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the plaintiff's claim against the defendant Seoul metro

A. 1) The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant traffic accident occurred by the Defendant’s negligence while occupying and constructing roads at night and neglecting the duty to take safety measures. The Defendant’s negligence in Seoul Metro shall be at least 50%. As such, the Defendant’s obligation to pay the Plaintiff the money stated in the purport of the claim. 2) The instant accident alleged in the Defendant Seoul Qro bears the obligation to pay the Plaintiff the money indicated in the purport of the claim. 2) The instant accident on the part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle is on the front side of 250 meters in work sections while inspecting the facilities using the Defendant’s vehicle.