1. Seoul Matro’s disposition of restricting the participation of unjust enterprisers for three months against the Plaintiff on February 23, 2017.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a legal entity that runs a peting service professional business.

Seoul metro was a corporation established pursuant to Article 49 of the Local Public Enterprises Act and the Ordinance on the Establishment and Operation of Seoul Qro for the purpose of the construction and operation of subway roads in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and established the defendant who is the litigation taking over the lawsuit in consequence of the merger with the Seoul Metropolitan City Urban Railroad Corporation on May 31, 2017.

B. Around 2013, the Plaintiff was determined as a successful bidder for the B management service contract of the Seoul Meart. On February 27, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a B management service contract with the Seoul Meart as follows: (a) from March 1, 2013 to March 31, 2015; (b) the service period as “from March 1, 2013 to March 31, 2015”; (c) the Plaintiff was determined as a successful bidder for the B management service contract of the Seoul Meart; and (b) on April 1, 2015, the Plaintiff signed the B management service contract with the employees and officers and employees stationed in the Seoul Meart with the said employees and employees who were stationed in the B management service contract of the Seoul Meart to the said employees and employees who were stationed in the B management service contract of the said Seoul Meart (hereinafter “instant contract”); and (c) on March 31, 2017 to the said employees and employees who were stationed in the Seoul Me.

The title “” sent by e-mail the network formation map of the Seoul metro, such as the annexed drawing Nos. 1. Moreover, the permanent employees and employees E are e-mail “the report on the analysis and assessment of security vulnerability in Seoul Meart in 2014 and 2015.”