logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.11.24 2017고정995
사문서위조등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B purchased a private document forgery and the aforementioned investigation document from E’s employees using F’s GV car brokerage service provider in the name of F. Defendant A as an agent for the insurance of Samsung Fire Insurance. Defendant B requested Defendant A to purchase a liability insurance policy in the name of F with a phone call during March 2016 without F’s consent. Defendant A consented to this request without any confirmation as to whether the Plaintiff intended to purchase a liability insurance policy in its name or consented to the preparation of insurance-related documents. Defendant B, at the request of Defendant B, intended to use the above NV car in a state of insurance. Defendant B, as an agent for the insurance of Samsung Fire Insurance, requested Defendant A to buy a liability insurance policy in the name of F with a phone call during March 2016. Defendant A consented to the foregoing request by the F. Defendant A to submit a document related to insurance in the name of F to the vehicle insurance purchaser.

Defendant

A, upon the public offering as above, at Samsung Fire Agency located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around 15:00 on March 15, 2016, A entered the vehicle number column of “G”, “from March 15, 2016 to May 24:00, 2016,” “F” in the contract column, and “F” in the lower part of the contract column, and affixed a signature and seal thereto. At that time, the agency used the document as if it was genuinely formed to an employee in charge of the automobile insurance of Samsung Fire Co., Ltd. belonging to the Samsung Fire Agency, who is not aware of such forgery by facsimile.

2. When Defendant B was unable to use the “private document forgery of the subscription form to change the car for personal use” and the said GN Sin Sin Scion document, Defendant B had the effect of the liability insurance already subscribed to the said car for non-commercial reasons, and had the intention to move it to a car on March 25, 2016 to Defendant A.

arrow