A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a request from the Representative C on May 2, 2016 from the firstman B, “to identify the company capable of using solar electricity licenses for housing”; and (b) tried to forge the seals of “D”, which can register electrical construction business and build solar energy facilities in accordance with the Electric Construction Business Act.

1. On May 2016, 2016, the Defendant: (a) had his/her employee, without authority, produce a seal affixed to “D” in which he/she is his/her representative; and (b) placed another’s seal on his/her own.

2. On May 2016, the Defendant: (a) posted a forged seal as prescribed in paragraph 1 on the application form for the use of electricity at the meltyang station parking lot located in the 757, Manyang-ro, Man-ro, Man-ro, Man-ro, Man-ro, Man-si; and (b) sent it to the said C as if it was genuine

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. C’s statement;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the reduction of personal identification of complainants and suspect employees;

1. Article 239 (1), 239 (2), and 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of uttering by a private person) concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order is that the defendant's use of the seal of the damaged company by forging the seal of the damaged company without obtaining the permission of the victimized company is minor;

It is not possible to see that the defendant's act could not cause a significant damage to the victim due to the defendant's act, and that the defendant's act could not have been used by the victim company is an element for sentencing disadvantageous to the defendant

On the other hand, the defendant seems to have been repented while making a confession of the crime of this case, and whether he could not proceed up to the forgery of the document, but make the seal forgery and display.