logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.17 2017고단7378
폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2017 Highest 7378" is a person living in the Seoul Station.

On October 16, 2017, around 15:30 on October 16, 2017, the Defendant refused to open the store on the ground that the Defendant frequently stolen goods from the victim F (36 o) manager of the above convenience store from the victim F (36 o). The Defendant used the victim's distribution and flag on the part of the victim's flag and flag on the part of the head at one time.

"2018 Highest 2239"

1. On January 23, 2018, the Defendant committed the crime, around 14:13, 2018, at the J convenience store managed by the victim I, the third floor of the H station in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon, the victim I, using the gap in which the surveillance of the victim was neglected, thereby putting the victim into the display room at the display stand equivalent to KRW 1,800, the market price of which was 1,800, and cut off.

2. Around March 12, 2018, the Defendant committed the crime of March 12, 2018: (a) around 23:35, 2018; (b) around 23:35, the Defendant: (c) Ma managed by the Victim L L in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul; (d) 2 C, as the first instance of the market price in which the victim’s surveillance was neglected; and (e) 3,320 won was used to put them into the Defendant’s locker; and (e) stolen the Defendant’s locker as it is.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 7378"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. F's statement protocol 2018 Senior 2239 ";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement with regard to I or L;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs, receipts, and photographs of damaged articles seized;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and Article 329 of the Criminal Act (the point of intent) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes even though he/she had been punished several times for violence and larceny crimes, etc. is disadvantageous to him/her.

However, the defendant is not a party.

arrow