beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The Defendant is a person who works for real estate investment, development, etc. in the name of several companies, such as DBA, DBA, FBA, etc., and the KFA, which is located in the fourth floor of G building in the early November 201, and the victim H, who was awarded a successful bid at DBA, the DBA, and DB, the KFA, who was sold the above real estate and paid the principal interest of KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, and paid the principal after three months after the repayment of the interest and principal of the loan. The Defendant stated that the office building in the present office building is a building and there is a lot of other real estate, so it is not clear that there is a lot of money.
However, at the time, the Defendant was unable to pay the monthly interest of KRW 1,100,000 to KRW 2.21 billion in total of loans borrowed from the Cultural Saemaul Fund as security by the said I land and the Chungcheong-gun of the Republic of Korea, and due to other real property than the above land, the Defendant was obliged to pay at least KRW 6,00,000 per month interest on the existing debt borrowed from the bond company due to such real property, and there was no ability to pay the said interest even if he borrowed money from the victim, and there was no intention to pay the victim with the said I real property.
As such, on December 5, 201, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) obtained KRW 65 million from the corporate bank account in the name of K in the name of K in the name of K in the name of D in the name of D in the bank; (c) KRW 135 million from the new bank account in the name of D in the name of K in the name of K in the Bank of Korea; (d) KRW 70 million from the agricultural bank account in the name of F in the name of the F in the Bank of Korea in December 26, 201; and (e) acquired KRW 30 million from the total amount to the agricultural bank account in the name of F in the name of F in the Bank of Korea in December 29, 201
2. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the defendant did not deceiving the victim with the same content as the above facts charged and did not have the intent to defraud each of the above money that the victim remitted.
Therefore, according to the records, the defendant stated in the above facts charged.