logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.04.21 2019나59366
건물명도
Text

1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim and the counterclaim by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff and defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from each argument in the court of first instance. In light of the evidence submitted in the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment by the court of first instance are

Therefore, the court's reasoning for this case is that the witness of the first instance court's 11,20,000 won per month of "the sixth 6th 6th ," "B," and "the 18th 5th 5 or 6th 6th ," and the special circumstance of "B," is as follows: "the 18th 12th ," and "the 12th 5th 12th ," are as stated in the part of the first instance court's reasoning; therefore, it is identical to the part of the first instance court's judgment in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and all appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow