1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The appeal costs.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows. The court's explanation of this case is based on evidence submitted by the court of the first instance and rejected the entries and videos of Gap evidence Nos. 24 and 25 (including paper numbers) which are insufficient to reverse the judgment of the court of the first instance. Among the judgment of the court of the first instance, it is identical to the statement of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance (including paper numbers) in the first instance, and it is so accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 2, “The result of each survey appraisal for the Korea Land Information Corporation in this Court” is “the result of each survey appraisal for the Director of the Korea Land Information Corporation in the first instance court, the result of the on-site verification by the court of first instance”;

(b)as “Witness Q’s testimony” in Part 5 of the fifth page 20 is “the testimony of Q of the first instance trial witness”;

(c) 6th page 6’s “the result of the appraiser’s written appraisal” is “the result of the commission of appraisal to the appraisal corporation of the court of first instance on the Daegu-Gyeongbuk Branch (Expert W) of the appraisal corporation;

(d) 0.017% “0.017%” in Part 6, paragraph 12, with “1.7%”;

(e)as “461 square meters” in Chapter 6-13;

(f) Category 3 and 4, “As a result of each testimony of witness Q and X, each entrustment of appraisal to the Korea Land Information Corporation of this Court,” of the first instance court to “as a result of each entrustment of measurement and appraisal to the witness Q and X testimony of the first instance court, and the head of the Korea Land Information Corporation of the first instance court to the Head of the Korea Land Information Corporation of the first instance

(g) 7 pages 11 of the 11st page “Seoul 1919,” respectively, shall be written at “ October 1919,” respectively;

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims of this case are all dismissed as it is without merit, and the defendant's claims of this case are accepted as reasonable. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and all appeals against the plaintiff's main claim of this case and counterclaim are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.