1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

No person related to a specific fire-fighting object shall engage in such conduct as closing (including locking), blocking, etc. that may hinder the function and performance of the fire-fighting system when the fire-fighting system is installed, maintained, or managed in accordance with the fire safety standards.

Defendant

B (Representative Director D) is a juristic person holding F from March 20, 2014 to Seosan City E, and Defendant A is a person working for the management division of Defendant B and the fire safety manager of Defendant B from that time.

1. Defendant A is a person who served as a fire safety manager in charge of the interest of the chief of the management department of a stock company B, and thus, Defendant A is obligated to maintain and manage fire-fighting systems in compliance with the fire safety standards

Nevertheless, the defendant from January 20, 2018 to the same year.

1. In the event a fire breaks out on the first floor of the above F building between around 30.30. Around the same day, the warning might interfere with the operation of crowdfunding;

I thought that the fire alarm system has been cut off at will.

Accordingly, the Defendant, at the same time and at the same place, arbitrarily extracted an inner warning device of the receiver, which is a warning device, at the time of a fire, and shut down and cut off the alarm system, which is installed on each floor, by dividing the location of the earth’s alarm system, and by stopping sirens and emergency broadcasting, which are installed on each floor, so as to hinder the function and performance of fire-fighting systems installed on specific fire-fighting objects.

2. Defendant B (Representative D) committed an act identical to that described in paragraph 1 in relation to the Defendant’s business at the time and place described in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written statement prepared by G;

1. Investigation report (report attached to the results of the F Fire-Fighting Investigation), the results of the fire-fighting investigation of the Seosan Fire Station, and the comprehensive precision inspection report;

1. An investigation report (report on attachment of relevant documents with respect to F Dangerous Goods Safety Manager);