logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.12.13 2017고단4402
화재예방,소방시설설치ㆍ유지및안전관리에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Busan Jin-gu B apartment (hereinafter referred to as "the apartment of this case") is a specific fire-fighting object with a fire-fighting system, such as automatic fire detection equipment, as an apartment house with at least five floors, and the defendant is a person appointed as a fire safety controller of the management office of the above apartment building around October 2015 and is a related person of the above specific fire-fighting object.

No person related to a specific fire-fighting object shall engage in such activities as closing (including locking) or blocking the function and performance of the fire-fighting system in maintaining and controlling the fire-fighting system installed on the specific fire-fighting object.

At around 07:32, 207, the Defendant maintained and managed the fire-fighting facilities of apartment units at the guard room of the 107-dong 107-dong 1,2, and 3, and 4, but did not correct the fact that the automatic fire detection equipment was arbitrarily operated in the state of blocking the location of the receiver of the automatic fire detection equipment at the seat of the 107-dong 107-dong 107-dong 901 of the instant apartment building and the signal was delivered to the guard room, and thus, the Defendant was not evacuated and was exposed to the flame, despite the fact that the fire was destroyed and the signal was delivered to the receiver at the guard room.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as seen above, committed an act of blocking fire-fighting systems that could disrupt the function and performance of fire-fighting systems, thereby causing injury to said C, such as inhaled images and carbon dissipated carbon poisoning, in which the number of days of treatment is unknown.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Investigation report (attached to a report on the situation of a fire, etc.) - The report on the situation of a fire, the report on a fire in B apartment, and the statement made by persons related to 107

1. Investigation report (Attachment of Information on Appointment of Fire-Fighting Safety Managers) - The results of inquiry into the history of appointment of fire-fighting safety managers, fire-fighting safety managers’ pocketbooks, and fire-fighting safety managers’ history;

arrow