beta
Text
The defendant's each crime in the second sentence of 2017, second sentence of 1269 and second sentence of 2017, second sentence of 1590 shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal record] On December 23, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court), and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 8, 2016.
[Criminal facts] 2017 Highest 1269
1. On February 7, 2017, at around 23:00, the Defendant posted a false letter stating that the victim D sells the game item in total at the market price of the app 1.80,000 won, such as the app 1,80,000 won and then contacted the victim to the Kakao Stockholm, and that “on the face of the game item, it would send money to the victim,” and that “on the face of the game item” was actually deposited to the victim as if the transaction price was paid in the item, the Defendant sent the victim a text message in the name of each unit, and then sent it to the victim, from the victim, the victim is affiliated with the same month.
8. From December 17, 2016 to April 18, 2017, at around 17:00, a game item was issued by deceiving victims over 25 times in total, as shown in attached Table 1, from around December 17, 2016 to around April 18, 2017.
However, even if the defendant received a game item from the damaged person, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to pay the equivalent price.
Accordingly, the defendant deceivings victims, and received the total amount of KRW 12,680,920 from the victims.
2. The Defendant attempted to commit fraud, around April 18, 2017, posted a letter on the FPC room located in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Sinsan-si, on the game item transaction site, “as he sold an item,” the victim G puts a letter on “as he sells an item”, which is the game item transaction site,, and makes contact with the victim and makes a false statement on “to send money to the victim for the transfer of an item.” However, the Defendant attempted to defraud the game item from the damaged person, but the Defendant did not comply with the transaction by failing to respond to the transaction.