logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.01.09 2017고단1735
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, among the newly constructed construction works of multi-family housing in Category C, needs to order D to order D with respect to the above construction works in the name of D, so D's seal, seal imprint certificate, copy of resident registration certificate, and E's business registration certificate operated by D was changed and kept after obtaining the delivery from D.

When the construction cost is insufficient while the above electrical construction is in progress, the defendant, as the main owner of the construction of the above new construction, is carrying out the construction with the loan from the loan broker who was introduced by F, which is the main owner of the above new construction, even though he did not obtain the above loan from D, he used the stamp, etc. received from D and used it as above, and decided to enter D arbitrarily as the joint guarantor or debtor, etc. in the loan document

1. On February 5, 2015, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) stated the loan amount column of the standard loan transaction contract in the form of loan brokerage office operated by G in the vicinity of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Department; (b) stated “A” in the name column of the guarantor, “D” and “H” in the name column of the guarantor; and (c) arbitrarily sealed D’s seal on the name of the guarantor.

As a result, the Defendant forged the standard contract for loan transaction in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations.

In addition, the Defendant forged 11 copies of loan-related documents in the name of S, a private document concerning rights and duties and proof of facts, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

2. The Defendant exercised the aforementioned investigation document at the same time and at the same place as above, each of the following events took place to G, who knew of the forgery, as described in paragraph 1, as if the document was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A complaint and one copy of the case search by the Supreme Court;

1. The Standard Contract for Loan Transactions (Investigation Record No. 61 page), a certificate of borrowing, a receipt of a loan, and a waiver of a lien;

arrow